Meeting Notes 2014 05 27 - Revision history

Hzeller: Undo revision 44891 by 176.10.100.227 (talk): remove random defacing.

2014-10-26T17:38:44Z

Undo revision 44891 by 176.10.100.227 (talk): remove random defacing.

Show changes

176.10.100.227: Replaced content with "http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-vBtWf9tfACo/VDaS0vFHokI/AAAAAAAACjI/J9AfXqIOiF4/s1600/taped37.jpg"

2014-10-21T00:22:24Z

Replaced content with "http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-vBtWf9tfACo/VDaS0vFHokI/AAAAAAAACjI/J9AfXqIOiF4/s1600/taped37.jpg"

Show changes

50.0.190.108: /* Membership Binder */

2014-06-25T14:38:18Z

Membership Binder

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 25 June 2014
Line 28:		Line 28:
	'''Xavier''': Week 4+. Sponsors: Kevin.		'''Xavier''': Week 4+. Sponsors: Kevin.

	'''Sid Scott''': Week 3. Sponsors: Mitch Altman, Naomi.		'''Sid Scott''': Week 3. Sponsors: <strike>Mitch Altman</strike>, <strike>Naomi</strike>. [these sponsorships have been revoked; next person w/ binder, pls make sure this gets noted next time.]

	'''Alan''': Week 1. Sponsors: none. Possibly only seeking associate membership.		'''Alan''': Week 1. Sponsors: none. Possibly only seeking associate membership.

Nthmost: /* Proposals from last week */

2014-05-29T21:04:58Z

Proposals from last week

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 29 May 2014
Line 49:		Line 49:

	== [[ Consensus Items History \| Proposals from last week ]] ==		== [[ Consensus Items History \| Proposals from last week ]] ==
	'''Naomi''': Consensus item was passed that you must tag yourself as a Member on the wiki. Shifts responsibilities of secretary onto individuals who by consequence have to display publicly that they are Noisebridge members, which is antithetical to ideals of people who founded the space. They are unhappy about it. Furthermore, 20 or so people did/would never do this and exerted civil disobedience about the rule. Follow edict of "don't give orders you don't expect people to follow" and do away with this policy item. We have a paper binder which fulfills legal requirement of having a member list without making it public to the world.		'''Naomi''': Consensus item was passed that you must tag yourself as a Member on the wiki. Shifts responsibilities of secretary onto individuals who by consequence have to display publicly that they are Noisebridge members, which is antithetical to ideals of people who founded the space. They are unhappy about it. Furthermore, 20 or so people did/would never do this and exerted civil disobedience about the rule. Follow edict of "don't give orders you don't expect people to follow" and do away with this policy item. We have a paper binder which fulfills legal requirement of having a member list without making it public to the world. ''[Point of info: the paper binder doesn't contain the current list of Members. Only the Secretary and a private GitHub repo contain that information. --[[User:Nthmost\|Nthmost]] ([[User talk:Nthmost\|talk]]) 21:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)]''

	'''John Ellis''': Detail about consensus item: don't have to use legal/wallet name. But some just don't like to use the wiki. There are some who are known by a name other than their legal ones, e.g. Mr. X. Also forgetting: what's the requirement to remain a member in good standing? Since last week, you have to pay dues.		'''John Ellis''': Detail about consensus item: don't have to use legal/wallet name. But some just don't like to use the wiki. There are some who are known by a name other than their legal ones, e.g. Mr. X. Also forgetting: what's the requirement to remain a member in good standing? Since last week, you have to pay dues.

Nthmost: /* Proposals for next week */ making my own statement more clear

2014-05-29T21:00:21Z

Proposals for next week: making my own statement more clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 29 May 2014
Line 118:		Line 118:
	'''John Ellis''': What are we trying to solve? We know that if someone comes in at 2am and doesn't know what Noisebridge is about, it's a good idea to look at the "ask to leave" policy. But if someone is visiting from Germany, we should allow them in. We could make this sound way more excellent.		'''John Ellis''': What are we trying to solve? We know that if someone comes in at 2am and doesn't know what Noisebridge is about, it's a good idea to look at the "ask to leave" policy. But if someone is visiting from Germany, we should allow them in. We could make this sound way more excellent.

	'''Naomi''': I'm willing to work on this text to make it worth changing. This text is trying to ameliorate the problems that the original text created. People thought they had to be invited to Noisebridge to attend at all, even those going to classes. Didn't solve any problems. We have the same problems we had before. We still have to ask people to leave. Types of people who are asked to leave: those who don't care about cultural code, and those who know about it but are too whacked out to behave and need to be yanked out. Text on the ~~page~~ will be read about people who want to know more about Noisebridge.		'''Naomi''': I'm willing to work on this text to make it worth changing. This text is trying to ameliorate the problems that the original text created. People thought they had to be invited to Noisebridge to attend at all, even those going to classes. Didn't solve any problems. We have the same problems we had before. We still have to ask people to leave. Types of people who are asked to leave: those who don't care about cultural code, and those who know about it but are too whacked out to behave and need to be yanked out. Text on the wiki will be read about by people who want to know more about Noisebridge and who actually want to follow the cultural code.

	'''Jeffrey''': You could use Google Drive, or GitHub...		'''Jeffrey''': You could use Google Drive, or GitHub...

JeffreyATW at 04:20, 28 May 2014

2014-05-28T04:20:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 27 May 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	'''Dan''': Wants to motivate people in Security/Safe Space WG to touch base and schedule meetings, wants to talk about nighttime scene, harm reduction, respectful use of space		'''Dan''': Wants to motivate people in Security/Safe Space WG to touch base and schedule meetings, wants to talk about nighttime scene, harm reduction, respectful use of space

	'''John''': Built book scanner for Digital Archivists, working on dedicated terminal this Thursday.		'''John Shutt''': Built book scanner for Digital Archivists, working on dedicated terminal this Thursday.

	'''Kevin''': Looking for interested ToorCampers, hacker camp/conference in mid-July in northern Washington. Looking to get NB caravan together. Let Kevin/Henner know		'''Kevin''': Looking for interested ToorCampers, hacker camp/conference in mid-July in northern Washington. Looking to get NB caravan together. Let Kevin/Henner know
Line 20:		Line 20:
	'''John Ellis''': Week 2. Sponsors: Naomi and ???		'''John Ellis''': Week 2. Sponsors: Naomi and ???

	'''John''': Sponsors: Naomi.		'''John Shutt''': Sponsors: Naomi.

	'''Deja''': Week 3. Sponsors: Naomi.		'''Deja''': Week 3. Sponsors: Naomi.
Line 69:		Line 69:
	'''Kevin''': No concerns with current consensus item?		'''Kevin''': No concerns with current consensus item?

	'''John''': Any concerns about current proposal?		'''John Shutt''': Any concerns about current proposal?

	'''John Ellis''': Before special events like an election, we should have a list of eligible voters just to check whether someone's on the list (is a member in good standing).		'''John Ellis''': Before special events like an election, we should have a list of eligible voters just to check whether someone's on the list (is a member in good standing).
Line 81:		Line 81:
	'''Deja''': We know the process, people who are not here, that's too bad.		'''Deja''': We know the process, people who are not here, that's too bad.

	'''John''': Do you know of any Members who would have an objection to this?		'''John Shutt''': Do you know of any Members who would have an objection to this?

	'''Jeffrey/Naomi''': Nope		'''Jeffrey/Naomi''': Nope
Line 95:		Line 95:
	'''Monad''': No objection.		'''Monad''': No objection.

	'''John''': Consensus passed.		'''John Shutt''': Consensus passed.

	== [[ Current Consensus Items \| Proposals for next week ]] ==		== [[ Current Consensus Items \| Proposals for next week ]] ==
Line 132:		Line 132:
	'''Alma''': Basic safety/security. There are some things in the room that could send you to the hospital.		'''Alma''': Basic safety/security. There are some things in the room that could send you to the hospital.

	'''John''': This is a separate discussion.		'''John Shutt''': This is a separate discussion.

	'''Mike''': As a new person, that new wording was what I saw, and I felt uninvited, but I came and felt welcomed. What about "be excellent to each other"?		'''Mike''': As a new person, that new wording was what I saw, and I felt uninvited, but I came and felt welcomed. What about "be excellent to each other"?
Line 157:		Line 157:
	'''John Ellis''': Two parts: be excellent and hack.		'''John Ellis''': Two parts: be excellent and hack.

	'''John''': Want to bring this back to talking about the consensus item.		'''John Shutt''': Want to bring this back to talking about the consensus item.

	'''Jeffrey''': We need clarification on what this consensus item is about.		'''Jeffrey''': We need clarification on what this consensus item is about.
Line 189:		Line 189:
	'''Dan''': Check in after the meeting and let's set up a general time to have a conversation.		'''Dan''': Check in after the meeting and let's set up a general time to have a conversation.

	'''John''': Any confusion about where to bring up certain items for discussion?		'''John Shutt''': Any confusion about where to bring up certain items for discussion?

	'''Naomi''': Some talk of replacing member shelves with lockers. If we're ready, with a truck, we could take care of some deals.		'''Naomi''': Some talk of replacing member shelves with lockers. If we're ready, with a truck, we could take care of some deals.
Line 204:		Line 204:
	'''Daniela''': Still working out the details.		'''Daniela''': Still working out the details.

	'''John''': Anything else to discuss, any other announcements? Meeting adjourned at 8:59.		'''John Shutt''': Anything else to discuss, any other announcements? Meeting adjourned at 8:59.

	= Attendance =		= Attendance =
	'''John''': Digital archivists group, 5mof		'''John Shutt''': Digital archivists group, 5mof

	'''Alma''': Trying to re-animate sewing area		'''Alma''': Trying to re-animate sewing area

JeffreyATW at 04:09, 28 May 2014

2014-05-28T04:09:16Z

Show changes

Bfb: Secretaribot says its time for the 315th Noisebridge notes

2014-05-28T02:19:49Z

Secretaribot says its time for the 315th Noisebridge notes

New page

You should read the [[meeting instructions]] forthwith!<br>
Don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.

These are the notes from the [https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The 315th Meeting of Noisebridge]. Note-taker: FIXME YOUR NAME HERE; Moderator: FIXME THEIR NAME HERE.
* '''One or two bullet points of high-level meeting summary.'''

= Short announcements and events =
* Bullet point list of announcements and events

= [[ Membership Binder ]] =
* The name of the applicant, the week of their application, and their sponsors.

= Financial Report =
* Funds in bank:
* Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):

= Consensus items =

== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] ==
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''

== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
''(Add any new items for consensus to the [[Current Consensus Items]] page.)''

= Discussion Notes =

= Attendance =
* List of names and short summary. For bonus points, link wiki user pages.

[[Category:Meeting Notes]]
Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.